Are BIOS Flaws in Illumina iSeq 100 DNA Sequencer a Security Risk?

January 8, 2025
Are BIOS Flaws in Illumina iSeq 100 DNA Sequencer a Security Risk?

In today’s rapidly advancing technological world, ensuring the security of critical devices such as medical and research equipment is paramount. Even minor vulnerabilities can lead to unexpected and sometimes disastrous consequences. The Illumina iSeq 100 DNA sequencer, widely used in medical and research laboratories, has recently come under scrutiny for potential security flaws in its BIOS/UEFI firmware. Eclypsium, a firmware security company, conducted a detailed analysis that uncovered these vulnerabilities, highlighting serious risks to the device’s functionality and reliability.

Understanding BIOS and UEFI Vulnerabilities

The Role of BIOS and UEFI in Device Security

BIOS, or Basic Input/Output System, is crucial for initiating hardware during the booting process and providing runtime services for operating systems. Originally, BIOS was the industry standard for PC firmware, but its limitations led to the development of UEFI, or Unified Extensible Firmware Interface. UEFI offers more advanced features and enhanced security compared to BIOS, aiming to address some of the old firmware’s shortcomings. Despite these improvements, vulnerabilities in either BIOS or UEFI can lead to significant security risks for devices relying on them.

In the case of Illumina’s iSeq 100 DNA sequencer, Eclypsium’s investigation demonstrated that these flaws could expose the device to bootkit attacks, which are particularly concerning for medical and research applications. Bootkits are advanced forms of malware that infect the bootloader or firmware to gain control over a system before the operating system even loads, making them difficult to detect and remove. Such vulnerabilities not only compromise the device’s security but also threaten the integrity of genetic analysis results, on which many medical diagnoses and research efforts depend.

Eclypsium’s Analysis of iSeq 100 Firmware

Eclypsium’s analysis revealed a range of weaknesses in the iSeq 100’s firmware, most notably the lack of standard write protections and the presence of an outdated BIOS version. Firmware with insufficient protections can be an easy target for attackers looking to install malicious code. In the case of the iSeq 100, the firmware version in question was B480AM12, dated April 12, 2018, which did not have essential security measures like writing protection enabled. This oversight could allow unauthorized modifications to the device’s boot code, potentially resulting in long-term persistent threats.

Operating without these critical protections makes the iSeq 100 susceptible to various types of attacks. Eclypsium’s findings underscore the importance of keeping firmware up-to-date and ensuring robust security measures are in place. The lack of these precautions could lead to severe disruptions not only in the device’s operation but also in the broader research and medical work relying on it. Given the high stakes in genetic analysis and diagnostics, the implications of compromised sequencing results are far-reaching and potentially catastrophic.

Specific Vulnerabilities Identified

Absence of Secure Boot and Compatibility Support Mode

One of the most alarming issues Eclypsium identified in the iSeq 100 was the absence of Secure Boot technology. Secure Boot is a security standard that ensures only trusted software can load during the boot process by verifying the bootloader’s authenticity and integrity. This process helps protect the system against malware that could run before the operating system loads. Without Secure Boot, the system becomes much more vulnerable to unauthorized software gaining control, a risk that is particularly unacceptable for devices handling sensitive information like genetic data.

In addition to the lack of Secure Boot, the iSeq 100 was found to be operating in Compatibility Support Mode (CSM). CSM allows legacy BIOS interfaces to be used, providing support for older hardware and software that may not be compatible with UEFI. While this can be useful in some contexts, it is not advisable for devices performing critical functions, as CSM can introduce additional security vulnerabilities. Operating in this mode means the device might not take full advantage of the security enhancements UEFI provides, leaving it open to exploits targeting older systems.

Detailed Vulnerabilities and Their Implications

Several specific vulnerabilities were noted during Eclypsium’s analysis, including susceptibilities to LogoFAIL, Spectre 2, and Microarchitectural Data Sampling (MDS) attacks. These are not new discoveries; some of these vulnerabilities have been known since 2017, emphasizing the prolonged risk period for devices like the iSeq 100. LogoFAIL is a technique that leverages BIOS image vulnerabilities, while Spectre 2 and MDS are side-channel attacks that exploit weaknesses in modern processors to leak data. An attacker leveraging these flaws could potentially alter the iSeq 100’s boot code to implant persistent threats.

These security gaps pose significant risks in medical and research environments. An attacker with control over the iSeq 100 could manipulate sequencing results, leading to incorrect diagnoses, flawed research conclusions, or even the misidentification of genetic data. Such tampering could undermine the trust in genomic data, compromising years of research work or delaying critical medical decisions. Ensuring that devices like the iSeq 100 are free from these vulnerabilities is essential in maintaining the integrity of genetic analysis and protecting the safety of patients and research subjects.

Broader Implications for Medical and Industrial Devices

Potential Widespread Impact

Eclypsium’s findings raised concerns beyond the iSeq 100, suggesting that similar vulnerabilities could exist in other medical and industrial devices using motherboards from IEI Integration Corp. IEI is well-regarded for producing industrial computer products and often serves as an Original Design Manufacturer (ODM) for various medical devices. This broad usage of IEI’s technology means that numerous devices could potentially share the same firmware vulnerabilities, amplifying the scope of the security risk. The recognition of these widespread weaknesses signifies a pressing need for a comprehensive review of firmware security across the industry.

The potential impact of such vulnerabilities underscores the broader necessity for rigorous and proactive cybersecurity measures in critical devices across various sectors. A compromised device in one laboratory or medical facility can quickly become an entry point for larger, more systemic attacks, culminating in widespread operational disruptions and data breaches. Identifying and addressing these firmware flaws in not only the iSeq 100 but also other susceptible devices can preclude potential exploits and enhance overall safety and reliability.

Risks Posed by Ransomware and State Actors

The exploitation of vulnerabilities in devices like the iSeq 100 can have far-reaching consequences. Particularly concerning are the threats posed by ransomware and state-sponsored actors. Ransomware attackers often aim to cripple devices, making recovery efforts exceedingly complex and coercing victims into paying ransoms to regain access. Disrupting medical and research operations through ransomware attacks can lead to significant financial losses and hinder critical healthcare delivery and scientific progress. The integrity of sequencing data is crucial, and any compromise can be a matter of life and death.

State actors also have a vested interest in these high-stakes devices due to their critical role in detecting genetic illnesses, cancers, drug-resistant bacteria, and aiding vaccine production. Tampering with these devices can lead to geopolitical advantages, espionage gains, or even biological threats. Thus, the strategic importance of fortifying the security of DNA sequencers cannot be overstated. Ensuring these devices are well-protected is vital to safeguard public health, national security, and scientific integrity against both financial and state-sponsored cyber threats.

Illumina’s Response and Mitigation Efforts

Notification and Patching Process

After uncovering these substantial security issues, Eclypsium promptly notified Illumina regarding the BIOS vulnerabilities in the iSeq 100. In response, Illumina took steps to address the flaws by issuing patches to their affected customers. However, the effectiveness of these patches and the timeline for their delivery have been subjects of inquiry. When approached by BleepingComputer for comments, an Illumina spokesperson assured that standard processes were being followed to notify impacted customers and implement necessary mitigations. They emphasized that the identified risks were not of the highest severity and assured customers of the company’s ongoing vigilance in product security.

While Illumina’s actions to patch these vulnerabilities demonstrate a commendable commitment to addressing the security gaps, the speed and thoroughness with which these patches are deployed remain critical. The efficacy of these mitigation efforts relies heavily on rapid and comprehensive implementation across all affected devices. Ensuring timely updates is crucial to prevent any potential exploit in the interim, thereby maintaining the integrity and functionality of the iSeq 100 in medical and research applications.

Illumina’s Commitment to Security

Despite downplaying the severity of the vulnerabilities, Illumina has affirmed its dedication to product security and the privacy of genomic data. The company has highlighted continuous efforts to enhance its processes for delivering security updates, reflecting a proactive stance towards maintaining the trust of their users. This security disclosure builds on previous advisories regarding Illumina’s Universal Copy Service (UCS), which impacted multiple products worldwide used in medical facilities and labs. The UCS vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-1966 and CVE-2023-1968) had high severity ratings, prompting Illumina to issue updates and mitigation instructions promptly.

The consistent emphasis on updating and securing their instruments underscores Illumina’s recognition of the importance of cybersecurity in genomics. Robust security measures are vital for protecting sensitive genetic data and ensuring that devices function reliably in their crucial roles. Illumina’s efforts in mitigating these vulnerabilities and reinforcing their security protocols are steps towards building a more secure infrastructure for genetic analysis and research. However, the ongoing challenge of staying ahead of emerging threats necessitates continuous vigilance and innovation in cybersecurity practices.

Conclusion

In our fast-evolving technological landscape, safeguarding critical devices like medical and research equipment is crucial. Even minor security gaps can lead to unexpected and potentially catastrophic outcomes. The Illumina iSeq 100 DNA sequencer, a crucial tool in medical and research labs, has recently come under the spotlight for potential security shortcomings in its BIOS/UEFI firmware. An in-depth analysis by Eclypsium, a company specializing in firmware security, revealed these vulnerabilities. The findings underscore significant risks, threatening both the device’s functionality and reliability. As researchers and medical professionals rely heavily on the accuracy and security of equipment like the iSeq 100, addressing these vulnerabilities is essential to prevent any disruption in medical diagnostics, research outcomes, or overall patient care. The discovery serves as a reminder of the continuous need for vigilance and advancement in cybersecurity measures, especially in sectors where even the smallest flaws can have profound repercussions.

Subscribe to our weekly news digest.

Join now and become a part of our fast-growing community.

Invalid Email Address
Thanks for Subscribing!
We'll be sending you our best soon!
Something went wrong, please try again later